Skip to content
Case Intelligence Assistant
Secure investigative AI — on your premises

AI-Powered Investigative File Analysis

Ask questions across your entire case file. Detect contradictions in witness statements. Reconstruct timelines automatically — all fully cited, auditable, and air-gapped on your own hardware.

Case Board
SYNTHETIC DEMONSTRATION CASE
  1. WS-00408:14

    “Left the Rusty Anchor just after 8, went straight home.”

    Witness statement

  2. CCTV-209:02

    Grey sedan enters the north lot.

    Camera review

  3. PHONE-1109:47

    Cell ping — Sector 4, two blocks from the scene.

    Carrier record

  4. CANVASS-0710:31

    Neighbour reports raised voices next door.

    Area canvass

  5. PR-00111:15

    First attending officer files initial report.

    Police report

Timeline conflict — WS-004 vs PHONE-11

Cited event Flagged for reviewAI-generated, investigator-reviewed
A draft case timeline, reconstructed from ingested documents — every event cited to its source, contradictions flagged for investigator review. Synthetic data shown.

Cited

Every answer traces to its document, page, and passage

Air-gapped

No cloud and no external calls — on your own hardware

Auditable

Every operation logged to a tamper-evident chain

Demonstrated throughout on fully synthetic case files — no real case data.

Product Walkthrough

See CiA in Action

Three minutes, end to end — ingestion, cited answers, contradiction detection, and a reconstructed timeline.

Investigations drown in information — boxes of statements, hours of audio, years of records. Somewhere in there, two documents disagree. CiA reads everything, remembers everything, and shows its work — so the investigator decides with the whole case in view.

AI assists. Humans decide.

Why Investigators Use It

The whole case file, working for you

Contradictions surface themselves

Timeline conflicts, description mismatches, alibi-versus-evidence discrepancies — surfaced for investigator review with the conflicting passages side by side, classified by type and ranked by severity.

WS-004 · Witness statement, p.2

“He left the Rusty Anchor just after 8 that morning and went straight home.”

PHONE-11 · Carrier record, p.4

Cell ping — Sector 4, two blocks from the scene, 09:47.

TIMELINE CONFLICTSynthetic example

Explore the platform

Every answer cites its source

Document, page, passage — every claim in every answer is traceable in one click. Nothing is hidden.

Cited — WS-004, p.3

The timeline builds itself

Every dated event across the case assembled into one draft chronology — gaps, overlaps, and sequences become visible.

Fully air-gapped, on your premises

No cloud. No external APIs. The application makes no external calls — with or without an internet connection on the box. One NVIDIA DGX Spark appliance inside your facility, and every operation logged to a tamper-evident audit chain.

In the synthetic demonstration case, the question is whether a suspect's alibi holds up. The platform surfaces the phone records placing the handset two blocks from the scene — with the exact quotes and page references — laid out beside the statement so an investigator can verify the contradiction directly. The cross-referencing that once took days is there to check in one place.
Illustrative walkthroughSynthetic demonstration case

See your next case the way CiA sees it.

Request a demonstration with a synthetic case file — ingest, query, contradictions, and timeline, live.